- From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:07:52 -0400
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADC=+jfttDHWtaVTP5kNruxx1ryTmb3+xh43BHevwrFGDUB0nw@mail.gmail.com>
Brian Kardell blog: http://briankardell.wordpress.com twitter: @bkardell fun: http://www.hitchjs.com On Sep 24, 2012 9:46 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > The Conditional spec <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/> is > basically finished. It's only got a handful of issues preventing it > from advancing: > > Issue 1, using the new conditions with @import. We propose pushing > this to level 4. It's not high-priority, so there's no reason to > delay the rest of the spec, or rush its development. > > Issue 2, the "font_face_rule" production is not defined by Fonts. We > propose just fixing Fonts, and removing this issue. ^_^ > > Issue 3, forward compatible parsing of @supports. We believe the > forward-compatible parsing is sufficient here. Testing selectors and > whatnot can be easily done in a way that is invalid per the current > grammar. > > Issue 4, adding an example with !important, can be trivially done. > I'll pick that up tomorrow - it takes all of ten minutes. > > The remaining issues are all regarding @document, and are > substantially harder. We propose pushing @document to level 4, so the > rest of the spec can advance quickly, since we already have several > implementors wanting to release the other features. > > Are our suggested fixes acceptable? Are there any other issues that > aren't yet marked in the draft? If the answers are yes and no, > respectively, we'll fix them and request a new WD this week or next. > > ~TJ and fantasai > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 14:08:26 UTC