- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:12:04 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:30 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 09/11/2012 08:51 PM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote: >> >> >> | If not omitted, a zero<'flex-basis'> component must be either >> | specified with a unit or preceded by both flex ratios. Otherwise the >> | user agent must interpret it as one of the flex ratios. >> >> should be enough. (But it all depends on what "component" means... >> *shrug*) > > > Ok, so I'm debating between that wording and the following: > > | A unitless zero that is not already preceded by two flex factors > | is interpreted as a flex factor. > | To avoid misinterpretation or invalid declarations, > | authors must specify such lengths with a unit or precede them by both > | flex ratios. I'd put an explicit "must" in the first sentence, but otherwise I like this. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 22:12:51 UTC