- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 23:42:57 +0200
- To: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: public-fx@w3.org, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGN7qDDGXJgexsvHbHQxNViYTYg9VdoFF=PcfxO_qC1NC5s9Rg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com> wrote: > > We've been getting many requests from designers and web developers to add > Photoshop's blend modes to the current working draft. > They felt that these blending modes are commonly used and are needed to > achieve certain effects. > > I propose that we extend the current list of blending modes with these > values: > > Linear dodge > Linear burn > Vivid light > Linear light > Pin light > Hard mix > Divide > Subtract > > These blend modes are not in the PDF spec. I checked the open source > browsers (and Apple's CoreGraphics) and they don't have an implementation > for them which may slow down their adoption. > If there are no objections, I will update the spec with the blend formulas > and example bitmaps. > > > I'd like to know how often these are used in practice. My (limited) > understanding is that the vast majority of cases use a small subset of > blending operations. As you mention, we don't necessarily support these at > the low-level, which complicates the implementation. I don't want to fill > the list for completeness - I'd prefer to have more justification. > True. I don't know how often these are used either. I talked to some people on the Photoshop team and they were also unsure of their popularity. I didn't put them in at first because I had the same idea as you: start small and add more later following user demands. I will hold off on adding them for now. > > This is fairly similar to the idea of adding more canned filter effects - > that represent the popular visual designs of today (not 1999 when the > filters were first proposed). I'd love to suggest more, but I also want to > wait to see how people use the small set we have given them, before being > able to argue for expanding the feature. > > Thanks! Rik
Received on Friday, 14 September 2012 21:43:26 UTC