> > -webkit-background-clip:text is the devil. It's a very silly > > misuse > > of background-clipping to accomplish a text fill. I like this > > functionality and think that we need it, but this particular > > implementation of it is ridiculous. I agree. Although I'm also confused as to the adding of these properties with no apparent plan towards standardization. Hopefully something like this can bring about a property such as "foreground-image", acting similar to background-image but only applying to the shape created by text. > > -webkit-text-fill-color is, as far as I can tell, completely > > useless. > > It does literally the exact same thing as 'color'. I haven't > > looked into our codebase to see what it actually accomplishes, but I think > > it was just a cargo-cult addition from the SVG model to go along with > > -webkit-text-stroke. > > AFAIK, `-webkit-text-fill-color` overrides standard `color`. This > makes it possible to separately specify two different colors for > browsers that do not support `-webkit-background-clip` (standard > `color` property is used) and for browsers that do support it > (`-webkit-text-fill-color` is used by browser instead of `color`) to > keep text readable anyway. Yes, this is my understanding as well.Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 21:56:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:17 UTC