- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:27:32 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > Usability question: is it potentially odd or confusing for the > > negative flex ratio to be a positive integer and to make negative > > values invalid? [1] > > > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-shrink-property > > No clue. I haven't been confused by it so far, but that's not a strong > indicator. > It doesn't bother me unduly either but on reading the prose I just found it odd to be told a negative ratio must be a positive integer. And given the encouragement to use the shorthand I wondered if making flex-shrink a negative could help make the value more readable by clarifying which flex value does what.
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 18:29:00 UTC