- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:42:37 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 18:43:34 UTC
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > > It's not clear to me with this change (or with the current spec text) > what > > should happen with flex-align/align-items: stretch on absolutely > positioned > > flex items. WebKit's current implementation happens to ignore stretch, > but > > that's not intentional. I can't really think of use-cases for wanting to > > stretch absolutely positioned items, except if you're trying to overlay > one > > item on top of the other. > > It should have an effect equivalent to align-self:start. Remember > that it only stretches the placeholder, and abspos static position > only cares about the top-left (or top-right in rtl) of the > placeholder. > OK. Just to double-check I understand this correctly, does this also mean that a flex-align:end absolutely positioned element in a row flexbox will position it's top to the bottom of the flexbox and overflow out the bottom?
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 18:43:34 UTC