- From: Rik <coolcat_the_best@hotmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 18:23:34 +0200
- To: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Oh, sorry. I meant to answer all. By the way, I think the values aren't supposed to allaw this difference, the properties should. in stead of this: "float: start", "float: end" and "float: head" and "float: foot". it should be this: float-x: start", "float-x: end" and float-y: start", "float-y: end" and maybe even this as addition: float: start end", "float: end end", float: start start", "float: end start" -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- From: François REMY Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:15 PM To: Rik Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative? Well, it's not up to me to make that decision. I think it's because they want to allow "float: start", "float: end", "float: head" and "float: foot". But ask them, I'm not sure. -----Message d'origine----- From: Rik Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:11 PM To: François REMY Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative? me too. it makes more sense to me then the rest. But is it neccesary? Why not begin/end? -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- From: François REMY Sent: Monday, May 28, 2012 6:06 PM To: CSS 3 W3C Group Subject: Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative? I like head/foot, too.
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 16:24:02 UTC