- From: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 15:28:27 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Perhaps, a naïve question, but would not it be possible to do define
syntax as var foo instead of var-foo?
.container {
var foo: 20px;
}
I guess I just like sh better than perl ;-)
I think var-foo is really ugly.
Peter
On 5/25/12 9:38 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Anyway, yeah, here's a summary of what changes I'd like to make:
>
>And of course, I forget one.
>
>6. (Optional, but desirable.) Change the syntax for *defining* a
>variable from "var-foo" to "$foo" as well. This resolves the issue
>that's been in the draft for a while where people want the definition
>and use of a variable to use parallel syntax. This one does require a
>Core Grammar change, but it's compatible with our forward-compatible
>error-handling. (#1 might also want a grammar change so we end up
>with a VAR token instead of a DELIM + IDENT pair that we then
>interpret as a variable in the parser, but it's not necessary.)
>
>~TJ
>
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 22:29:01 UTC