Perhaps, a naïve question, but would not it be possible to do define syntax as var foo instead of var-foo? .container { var foo: 20px; } I guess I just like sh better than perl ;-) I think var-foo is really ugly. Peter On 5/25/12 9:38 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Anyway, yeah, here's a summary of what changes I'd like to make: > >And of course, I forget one. > >6. (Optional, but desirable.) Change the syntax for *defining* a >variable from "var-foo" to "$foo" as well. This resolves the issue >that's been in the draft for a while where people want the definition >and use of a variable to use parallel syntax. This one does require a >Core Grammar change, but it's compatible with our forward-compatible >error-handling. (#1 might also want a grammar change so we end up >with a VAR token instead of a DELIM + IDENT pair that we then >interpret as a variable in the parser, but it's not necessary.) > >~TJ >Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 22:29:01 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:15 UTC