- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 22:14:34 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
[Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > This is just a general preference question for implementors. > > When I pick up Syntax again, would it be better for me to write the > parsing section as if it the tokenizing was already completely done, or > interleaved with the tokenizing like the HTML parser is? What would be > more useful? I can do either, but I'd rather not have to switch partway > through, or even after I'm totally done. > Not sure what you're asking. I think I'd rather implement a parsing algorithm based on a clear and unambiguous definition of what the tokens actually are. Recent threads suggest the latter may need some polishing?
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 22:15:12 UTC