On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > On Friday 2012-05-25 11:43 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Sorry, I didn't fully apply the proper edits. Look in the prop table. > > I guess the important part is: > > [ <number> | <percentage> | <dimension> | <string> | <ident> | > <url> | <function> | <hash> ] > > I'd note that <dimension>, <ident>, <function>, and <hash> aren't > actually defined anywhere. Yes, I expect to define them in the Syntax spec. They have the obvious definitions (<dimension>, <ident>, and <hash> are equal to the corresponding tokens, <function> is equal to the function production in Appendix G). > And, in particular, <function> being > defined according to the core grammar would mean this isn't a > simplification at all for implementations, but just constrains the > future syntax of property values (e.g., to not use parentheses as > some drafts of the background shorthand did). Improvements welcome. If you think I should '(' <value> ')' valid, I can do that. ~TJReceived on Friday, 25 May 2012 19:27:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:16 UTC