- From: Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 23:34:21 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On May 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, fantasai wrote: >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Tony Chang<tony@chromium.org> wrote: >> Note that the grid only gets "messed up" if the screen is small enough >> to make some of the items less than their min-size. min-size only has >> an effect when an item tries to shrink below it; during normal flexing >> it has no effect. > > (Phil or dholbert can correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC, Grid also honors min-content sizes in most cases.) Min-content comes into play for a grid item any time its alignment is not stretch (stretch is the default alignment) as the grid item will be shrink-to-fit sized into its grid cell and then aligned. Min-content also affects the size of the track (and therefore the size of any box that is stretch aligned over that track) when the track has a sizing function that uses one of the *-content keywords, e.g. minmax(min-content, 1fr) or auto which is equivalent to minmax(min-content, max-content). If you have tracks sized to a certain length (or fraction or percentage on a non-auto sized grid element) and the grid item contained in a cell covering those tracks has stretch alignment, then the min-content size plays no part in determining the final size of the item's box. Example: <div style="display:grid;-ms-grid-columns:1fr;-ms-grid-rows:1fr;width:10px;height:10px"> <div>I'm a grid item. My box is ten pixels by ten pixels even if that causes my own contents to overflow my box.</div> </div> Hope that helps, Phil
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 23:35:47 UTC