- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 10:24:57 -0700
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > To be clear, I was suggesting that row-reverse/column-reverse/wrap-reverse > should also affect tab-order. Ah, that wasn't clear. Okay. So tab order should always be "visual order", more or less. >> I think what it actually means is that we need a less naive treatment >> of selections. (I don't know what that would be, though.) > > Correct. We need to solve one problem or the other. The status quo is really > bad IMO. I suppose as these sorts of things become more prevalent, there > will be more pressure on browser vendors to do the more complicated disjoint > selections. It makes selection code much more CPU intensive though. :( Yeah, it's a hard problem. Sorry. :/ ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 17:25:47 UTC