W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] order

From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:21:15 +0200
Message-ID: <20120524052115.261750@gmx.net>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
> The WG resolved to change 'flex-order' to just 'order', rather than to
> 'box-order'
> or 'display-order', which were proposed before the call. This name is
> *very* generic,
> and brings up the following questions:
>    1. Does it affect z-order?
>    2. Does it affect tab-order?
>    3. Does it take effect in speech media as well as visual?
> If the answer to the latter two is "no", then I'd like to reconsider
> whether 'order' is the right name here.

I also think that 'order' is too generic.
'item-order' was also mentioned in the conf call. Another suggestion: 'child-order', based on the statement "Children of a flexbox are called flexbox items" at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#flexbox-item.

Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir
belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 05:21:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:16 UTC