- From: Sebastian Zartner <sebastianzartner@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 07:21:15 +0200
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
> The WG resolved to change 'flex-order' to just 'order', rather than to > 'box-order' > or 'display-order', which were proposed before the call. This name is > *very* generic, > and brings up the following questions: > > 1. Does it affect z-order? > 2. Does it affect tab-order? > 3. Does it take effect in speech media as well as visual? > > If the answer to the latter two is "no", then I'd like to reconsider > whether 'order' is the right name here. I also think that 'order' is too generic. 'item-order' was also mentioned in the conf call. Another suggestion: 'child-order', based on the statement "Children of a flexbox are called flexbox items" at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#flexbox-item. Sebastian -- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 05:21:46 UTC