- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 17:31:55 -0700
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr.: >> CSS makes no judgement about what's inside of the url() notation. >> Both the 2.1 Core Grammar and my recasting in Syntax just accept >> everything inbetween the parens. > > OK, but css3-values does care about what's in there, right? It has to say > something about what it means. Or is it up to each individual property that > uses <url> to say to interpret it per RFC 3987, or the new URL spec? CSS3 Values doesn't care what's inside of it either. It's just a string. V&U explicitly defines to use 3986 right now to absolutize a URL, so specs don't need to care about that detail. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2012 00:33:04 UTC