- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:13:52 -0700
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > On May 18, 2012, at 08:34, John Daggett wrote: >> Both Tab and Elika feel that any unquoted name that includes >> keywords like 'inherit' should be invalid, so declarations like >> the ones below would be invalid: >> >> font-family: foo inherit; >> font-family: inherit foo; > > I don't see any ambiguity in the spec about these. They are valid family names. Some real-world examples would be: > > font-family: Microsoft Sans Serif > font-family: Schoolhouse Cursive B I don't understand. Neither of your examples have global keywords in them, so they don't seem to be relevant. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 18:15:03 UTC