- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:16:13 +0200
- To: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "CSS 3 W3C Group" <www-style@w3.org>
The fact I can live with a certain proposal (hopefully) doesn't mean it's my preference or the best solution. If you ask about my preference, it's clear I would prefer that both alignments use the term align, with an axis-defining keyword. I wouldn't have taken the time to forge counterproposals if I was perfectly happy with current state of the spec. The point is: my preference is purely indicative. However, seeing that you and Lea seems to share the 'justify' concern, this seems to be a legit one. Inline/crossline-align may be a solution. -----Message d'origine----- From: Brad Kemper Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [css3-align] The Great Alignment Bikeshed On May 20, 2012, at 12:22 PM, François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr> wrote: > I can now live in a world where “align” is about cross axis alignement and > “justify” about the inline one. So are we going to change 'text-align' to 'text-justify'? This seems backwards to me. 'text-align' sets the precedent.
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 11:17:00 UTC