- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 01:44:03 +0000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Chris Jones <cjon@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Phil Cupp <pcupp@microsoft.com>, Markus Mielke <mmielke@microsoft.com>
[Glenn Adams:] >On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: >> start and end should be avoided when referring to writing mode relative >> edges in the row axis; that is, before/after should be used for row axis >> (which follows block progression) with reserved start/end for column axis >> (which follows inline progression); >That's not being disputed; the issue is fantasai is proposing tying >start/end to the "main" axis and before/after to the "secondary" axis, >which have no inherent relation to the writing mode. (In Flexbox, >they depend on flex-direction. In Grid, "main" is "inline" and >"secondary" is "block".) >in that case, i support fantasai's proposal, but do not support chris' proposal to use start/end for both axes Could you elaborate on why?
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 01:44:39 UTC