- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 23:48:35 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:34 PM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > I think the answer here is to come up with wording that explicitly > defines as valid/invalid the rules below: > > /* valid */ > font-family: inherit foo; > font-family: foo inherit; > font-family: initial foo; > font-family: foo initial; > font-family: default foo; > font-family: foo default; > > /* invalid */ > font-family: inherit, foo; > font-family: foo, inherit; > font-family: initial, foo; > font-family: foo, initial; > font-family: default, foo; > font-family: foo, default; I still support my and fantasai's assertion that any use of the reserved keywords are invalid; in other words, the <user-ident> type simply does not include those keywords. Browsers are inconsistent, but I highly doubt there's any compat risk whatsoever. We should be able to make this sane without any problem. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 06:49:27 UTC