- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 15:17:50 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 10 May 2012 12:31:16 +0200, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote: > fantasai replied: >> I don't understand how [device-pixel-ratio: 2] is any better than >> resolution: 2ddpx; > > As currently defined, these both do the same thing. I agree that we need > a media query to do this—to detect the relationship of CSS pixels and > device pixels—but I think naming such a media query "resolution" is a > mistake. Also, as Maciej pointed out, ddpx is much less understandable > to people unfamiliar with it. It's dppx, of course, not ddpx. Being familiar with the "px" unit and knowing what e.g. "dpi" stands for, I don't find it hard to figure out (or remember) what "dppx" means. I don't find the term "device-pixel-ratio" more readily understandable at all. A ratio of what, to what? -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Thursday, 10 May 2012 13:18:27 UTC