Re: [css3-flexbox] if 'flex' is a shorthand, it should be defined as such

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:24 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
> While there's a passing comment at the end of
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flexibility-components saying
> that 'flex' is a shorthand property, nothing in the definition of
> the property at http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flexibility
> says that it's a shorthand property.
>
> In particular, in order to be a shorthand:
>
>  * the definition should say how the parse structure of the values
>   of the shorthand maps to values of its longhand subproperties
>
>  * its "Initial value", "Computed value", and "Animatable" lines
>   should say "see individual properties"

Fixed!

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 22:18:35 UTC