- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 12:33:07 +0200
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:46 AM, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com> wrote: > * fallback occurs across a given text run rather than per-character Your argument and demonstration seems convincing. It would probably be very ugly in many cases to mix different methods of fallback in a single text run. > * the 'font-variant-position' property is defined independent of > the existing use of the font-size/vertical-align properties to > synthesize subscripts/superscripts I can't quite tell from your email what you're suggesting this should do. I *think* it's asking for a property that switches to sub/sup glyphs if they all exist, otherwise falls back to synthesized, and has no special interaction with line-height/font-size/etc. This would mean that existing <sub>/<sup> styling wouldn't change - it would continue being fully synthetic unless we change the default stylesheet. Correct? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 10:33:57 UTC