In practice, authors do target an engine since the latter implement a specific draft behind their prefix and keep it that way until unprefixing time (and beyond, in some cases). But I care less about the name than I do about having a single ! modifier in the declaration. From: François REMY [mailto:fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr] Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:34 AM To: Sylvain Galineau Cc: www-style@w3.org Subject: RE: Vendor-prefixes: an idea Why not. This simplifies greatly token interpretation, and encourage to specify more than one implementation, due to the parentheses. However, if you want to keep the philosophy I developed behind the original proposal, I would prefer something like !draft(ms), !target(ms) or !wd(ms). Authors shouldn't target an user agent, but a draft; even if most (if not all) draft implementations are vendor dependent in the phase during which thoses DVMs are expected to be used. ________________________________ De : Sylvain Galineau Envoyé : 08/05/2012 23:12 À : Tab Atkins Jr.; Jonathan Snook Cc : François REMY; CSS 3 W3C Group Objet : RE: Vendor-prefixes: an idea [Tab Atkins Jr.:] > > border-radius: 3px !moz-draft !webkit-draft !o-draft; > Fwiw I think I'd rather see something like: border-radius: 3px !ua(moz,webkit,o,ms)Received on Wednesday, 9 May 2012 09:13:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:15 UTC