- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 12:52:42 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Monday 2012-05-07 12:49 +0200, L. David Baron wrote: > On Saturday 2012-05-05 15:02 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > Properties can be shipped in unprefixed form once both of the following are true: > > (A) The appropriate standards group (most likely the CSS WG for CSS properties) has agreed to take up the relevant specification as a work item; AND > > (B) At least two independent roughly interoperable (though not necessarily identical in all edge cases) implementations are publicly available. > > I think this is largely reasonable, except I'd like an opportunity > to reconsider taking things up as a work item, given its additional > implications. Also, I think it requires "taking up as a work item" to be a step that actually involves a decision of the group. In the CSS group this frequently isn't the case: editors add things to editors' drafts of existing work items and then ask the group if it's ok at the time of a request for TR publication (which might be substantially later). I think if we wanted to switch to this model, we'd need editors to ask the group before adding new topics to their specifications. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 10:53:15 UTC