- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:14:17 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/05/2012 12:32 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > I'm not sure we want or need this consistency here; I think normal was just > a poor choice as the opposite to alternate. Maybe 'continuous' would have > been better? CSS3 Marquee uses 'forward' vs. 'reverse': http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-marquee/#the-marquee-direction I think using forward/reverse would be a good combination for animation-direction as well. > I think a case could be made that the property should have been a combination > of two keywords: one describing the timeline direction, the other the repetition > direction. They'd have two values each and 4 combinations. But web sites already > use alternate so I'd rather not make a cosmetic change. Unless, maybe, we have > solid reasons to believe the 2x2 matrix could turn into a 3x3 one, in which case > the current flat model is painful. Switching 'normal' to 'reverse' or 'alternate-reverse' to 'alternate reverse' wouldn't affect sites specifying 'alternate'. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 03:14:49 UTC