Re: Proposition to change the prefixing policy from Daniel Glazman on 2012-05-05 (www-style@w3.org from May 2012)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 23:32:28 +0200
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4FA59C6C.7030606@disruptive-innovations.com>

Le 05/05/12 16:03, Sylvain Galineau a écrit :

> *: Yes, I am thinking of gradients. Yes, I agreed to most of these changes at the
> time. Yes, I now believe I was mistaken. Yes, we shouldn't extrapolate from just
> one recent case. Still, the process explicitly allowed and enabled these changes
> to happen. I see no reason to believe this can't happen again beyond the fact that
> some of us acquired a strong distaste for such decisions from that experience.

Then you probably think of CSS Transforms. It has had skew() for ages,
it's used in the wild, and then the last version of the spec got rid of
it. After 3 years. Hum ?

</Daniel>

Received on Saturday, 5 May 2012 21:32:55 UTC