- From: Ambrose LI <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 01:49:34 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2012/5/4 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>: > On 05/03/2012 08:08 AM, Ambrose LI wrote: >> >> >> But then what is the purpose of keep-all then? If I just read that >> description quoted above I’d assume it *is* the “explicit action” that >> I needed. > > > The purpose of keep-all is to keep consecutive CJK characters together, > whereas normally they are allowed to break anywhere. > > This is common in Korean, which, like English, uses spaces to separate > words. > > It is also sometimes useful for mixed-script text, where zh/ja snippets > are mixed into another language that uses spaces for separation. Hmm, I guess I remember asking this exact same question before. I didn’t understand back then, and I’m afraid I still don’t understand. The need to have keep-all functionality in Latin text is as real as that in CJK text. Why are the two kinds of scripts treated so differently? I mean, this is an override; why can’t we have a consistent way to override? This makes no sense to me. > ~fantasai > -- cheers, -ambrose <http://gniw.ca>
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 05:50:03 UTC