- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 17:44:08 -0700
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 05/03/2012 05:39 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * fantasai wrote: >> My understanding of the discussion was that we would disallow 'inherit' as >> an identifier in font names, regardless of its position. > > This requirement would be quite non-obvious, nobody would think that a > declaration like `font-family: Initial Caps` could be confused with a > declaration like `font-family: initial`, the former clearly refers to a > font name while the latter uses a special keyword. > If the Working Group > wants to go down that road, it should make this a rule for all ident+ > grammars and probably also for plain `ident` grammars, so it's clear the > keywords "inherit" and "initial" and possibly others are always special. That's the point, yes. That's why we brought it up in the context of CSS3 Values and Units -- to exclude inherit/initial from <identifier>. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 4 May 2012 00:44:40 UTC