- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:08:44 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:20 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Right now the spec says: > # but with the item causing the break automatically starting a new line in > the step > > Firstly, this makes no sense for break-after. Heh, yeah. > Secondly, this means that an item can cause a flex line break in paged mode > but not > in continuous mode. I don't think this is a good idea: it should either > always cause > a line break, or never cause a line break. Therefore IMO forced breaks on > items in > row flexboxes should be propagated to the flex line and ignored on the item > itself. Makes sense. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 16:09:34 UTC