W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] before/after terminology alternative?

From: Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:53:45 +0900
Message-Id: <51BF901F-DF06-42B6-A7ED-040BA6E6526B@l-c-n.com>
To: www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>

Le May 2, 2012 à 2:59 AM, fantasai a écrit :

> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline directions,
> but most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the logical
> block directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would
> that be clearer? Do we want to switch?

That is quite obscure, particularly for people who are not English speakers (and/or don't 'think' in English). -before/-after is (conceptually) much clearer to me and says exactly what is in the package.

Philippe Wittenbergh
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 00:54:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:15 UTC