Re: [css3-transforms] Behavior on UAs without 3D support from Boris Zbarsky on 2012-05-01 (www-style@w3.org from May 2012)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 17:43:55 -0400
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <4FA0591B.8000003@mit.edu>

On 5/1/12 5:25 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> 3) 3D transform functions are treated as invalid if a UA just supports 2D. In this case any property settings are rejected if a 3D transform was found. Independent if 2D transforms are included in this list as well. This gives the author the possibility to provide two different transforms. One for UA's with and one for UAs without 3D support:

This seems like the right approach to me for a UA that doesn't want to 
do 3D.  This is certainly how it would work if they were separate 
modules and the UA just did not support the 3D module.

-Boris

Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 21:44:27 UTC