On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > In animation cases, it effectively removes a feature (and adds a new one). > > As such "in the wild" we don't really have data yet because animations + gradients is new territory. > > We should probably at least have a note in CSS3 that it is likely the rule ordering will change in CSS4 so that authors have a warning now rather than having content break later. There already is such a warning - we tell authors explicitly *not* to misorder their stops, and to avoid certain practices that might accidentally result in misordered stops. The step in question is *error-handling*, so that we have a sane model to work with when we actually draw the gradient. It's not actually *functionality*, except insofar as *every* detail is a function to someone. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 1 May 2012 21:07:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:15 UTC