- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 14:20:56 -0400
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- CC: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> Waiting for UTR50 to go final is what you're doing now. What we are suggesting > is that you should no do that. Instead: > 1. Refer to UTR50 now; specifically, do not refer to your own hosted copy > of the UTR50 data on w3.org > 2. Define the mapping of MVOsimple and SVOsimple in terms of MVO and SVO > normatively (it currently is in a note). > > In other words tell implementors how they can generate their own vosimple.txt > and leave it at that. > > Does that clarify the expectation? Yeah, that's clear, thank you. For #2, I'm good with that. For #1, it looks strange to me. When EPUB WG came to us and wanted to refer our WDs two years ago, didn't we recommend not to do that because WDs could possibly change drastically? Didn't we recommend them to refer at least a dated version, or even have a copy rather than moving target if they have to use WDs? It looks to me that what you're recommending is to do exactly what we asked EPUB WG not to do. Did I miss something here? Regards, Koji
Received on Saturday, 30 June 2012 18:18:09 UTC