- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 10:40:05 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/28/2012 05:18 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > I think we've fixed this now. As part of an unrelated edit, we've > separated out the concept of "flex base size" (unclamped) and > "hypothetical main size" (clamped). We've now added an additional > step to the flex distribution algo that explicitly sets the used size > of all elements that are inflexible (given whether we're in a grow or > shrink situation). > > Are the chances all right? Yup, this looks great -- the two changes you mentioned above did indeed address my concern. Thanks, ~Daniel
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 17:40:32 UTC