- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:34:14 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- CC: liam@w3.org, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, MURAKAMI Shinyu <murakami@antenna.co.jp>, Michael Day <mikeday@yeslogic.com>
On 06/11/2012 11:24 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: > Le 12/06/2012 07:20, Liam R E Quin a écrit : >> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 21:40 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>> I don't see a real use-case for >>> simply hiding an entire page, >> >> "print only odd pages" ? >> >> "do not show me (or print) pages that refer to the spaceships with only >> one warp drive, since they do not apply to me" ?? > > I don’t know if these are use cases we should address in CSS, but: > > If 'visibility' is consistent with what it does on elements, it would rather generate a page with nothing painted on it. Yes, this would make sense for 'visibility: hidden'. > Not generating the page at all would be more like 'display: none'. Note however that we might still need to do the layout for > the whole page content, in order to know where the next page starts. Although, maybe 'visibility: collapse' could be used suppress a page in the output, similar to how it collapses table rows or flex items? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 22:34:46 UTC