- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:29:55 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jun 22, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote: > On 2/05/2012 10:53 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: >> >> Le May 2, 2012 ¨¤ 2:59 AM, fantasai a ¨¦crit : >> >>> We're pretty settled on start/end for the logical inline directions, >>> but most people aren't that thrilled with before/after for the logical >>> block directions. Someone suggested head/tail as an alternative. Would >>> that be clearer? Do we want to switch? >> >> That is quite obscure, particularly for people who are not English speakers (and/or don't 'think' in English). -before/-after is (conceptually) much clearer to me and says exactly what is in the package. > > > Agree also with before/after. Before/after gives no hint that it means before/after in the block progression dimension and not the inline direction. The same is true of start/end, for that matter.
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 18:30:36 UTC