- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:46:36 +0000
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Chris Eppstein <chris@eppsteins.net>, Divya Manian <manian@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu:] > [violent snipping] > I would encourage folks to come up with/identify more proposals that are not > "property-like", ideally ranked by preference so that we have better > chance to converge. +1 to that. While I can definitely sympathize with the type of concern Chris and Divya are expressing I have a hard time reaching a conclusion without concrete alternatives I can compare. So I understand what Tab is explaining but since explaining != convincing (obviously) I'm sort of stuck. > Whether this is trivial or not, syntax bike-shedding seems to be the main topic of this thread. Well, this member would rather get the bikeshedding done and over with early on; that would be orders of magnitude better than right before Last Call when we have 3+ implementations, countless web sites and hundreds of well-known tutorials, demos and blog post assuming the current syntax. Especially for a feature which, imo, we absolutely do not want to put out in to the wild under multiple vendor prefixes. The bikeshedding will happen anyway; sooner may be better than later.
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 17:47:30 UTC