- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:19:46 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 13/06/2012 00:26, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit : >> I think that Syntax3 should not make any assumption on the content of >> at-rules and do something like this instead: >> >> […] > > I don't think this is necessary. I think we can just dispatch based > on the at-keyword token's value to either a mode that recognizes > at-rules and style rules, or one that recognizes at-rules and > declarations. I think both ways to think of this are more or less equivalent. My main point was that the mapping between at-keywords and "what the block contains" should not be hard-coded in Syntax but defined in other modules, wherever an at-rule is defined. -- Simon Sapin
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 07:20:19 UTC