- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:16:40 -0700
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com> wrote: > Right now, section 4.4 "Implied Minimum Size of Flex Items" on the > flexbox ED says: > > # Name: min-width, min-height > [...] > # auto > # On a flex item, this keyword indicates > # a minimum size of the min-content size. > # It is intended that this will compute > # to the ‘min-content’ keyword [...] > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#min-size-auto > > This doesn't make any distinction about the orientation of our flexbox. > (horizontal vs. vertical) > > So right now, the spec is calling for all flexbox items to have *both* > their min-width *and* their min-height default to "min-content". > > I'd thought we only wanted this magic for the main axis's min-size > property, not for both min-size properties. Maybe I misunderstood though? Yes, the intention is to only have the magic apply in the main axis. The cross-axis should be allowed to shrink to 0 unless the author has set an explicit min size in that axis. I'll have to fix this. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 01:17:29 UTC