- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:04:53 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:50 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 06/12/2012 05:55 AM, Simon Sapin wrote: >> Also, Werner Donné pointed out that the 'page' production is not LL(k) >> (with or without the above fix.) I don’t know if this >> is a requirement. Discussion starts here: >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Apr/0620.html > > Filed as ISSUE-263: > https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/263 > > I'm not enough of a grammar person to know what to do with that issue, > though. There's nothing about the @page grammar that requires more than LL(1). I'll help fix it later. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2012 01:05:42 UTC