- From: Andrei Bucur <abucur@adobe.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:37:59 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 08:38:30 UTC
Hello! I've ben looking on the fragmentation spec for a while and I'm noticing that the UA are sometimes allowed to implement differently the breaking between fragmentainers. Some examples are: 1. Breaking the monolithic elements: the UA may overflow or slice the graphical representation 2. If the content doesn't fit & there are no possible break points, the UA may break anywhere 3. Finding unforced breakpoints when neither of the rules A..D help 4. The optimizing unforced breaks guidelines If I'm a content author writing a publication using regions/columns, I expect that the content will be displayed consistently in all the browsers. Is there a specific reason to leave some of the fragmentation behavior up to the UA to decide? Thanks, Andrei.
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 08:38:30 UTC