- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 22:44:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, 7 Jun 2012, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > fantasai wrote (quoting me): > >> > >> > ...it seems :hover should be defined, at least for HTML's purposes, as > >> > working as follows: > >> > > >> > : An element matches :hover if: > >> > : > >> > : - It is designated by a pointing device, or > >> > : - Any of its descendants are designated by a pointing device, or > >> > : - It is the "labeled control" of a<label> element that matches :hover. > >> > > >> > Like Boris, I don't mind where this is specced, but we should spec it > >> > somewhere. Is the Selectors spec able to spec this? > >> Technically, yes, but I think it's a bit out of scope for Selectors to > >> specify HTML-element-specific behavior. Is it very specific to :hover? > > > > > > It's very specific to :hover, yes; there is also a click-related issue but > > that's already specced. I can spec the :hover bit it in HTML if you think > > that would be more appropriate; I don't mind either way. Should I? > > Yes, that would be great. Do you need an anchor in Selectors to link to? Nah, I'll just add it here: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#pseudo-classes -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 22:45:22 UTC