- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:49:52 -0800
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > I just added the image-rendering property from SVG in WeasyPrint, a CSS > engine. I made it apply to image replaced elements and background images. > > SVG 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation, but the property is not in any CSS spec > (AFAIK) so I prefixed it. However, this case is not covered in > http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes > > As an implementer, should I use a prefix in such a case? It being present in SVG 1.1 is sufficient to allow you to not use a prefix. The property was in Image Values 3, but I kicked it to level 4 since there was little to no implementation experience. You can see it at <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css4-images/Overview.src.html#image-rendering> - it's a bit different than the SVG version. If you wish to implement this version, I recommend using a prefix, and expecting it to change in the future. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 16:50:48 UTC