- From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:09:29 +0000
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Jan 30, 2012, at 4:34 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: > Brad: >> Simon: >>> If we're going to define spread behavior for text-shadow based on >> stroking, I think we should do the same for box-shadow, and specify the >> miter behavior. >> >> I thought we more or less did so, describing how the 90deg corners >> remain sharp before blurring takes place. > > I was under the same impression. > > Simon, can you elaborate? The spec doesn't define spread in terms of stroking: <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-box-shadow> It talks about a thresholding approach, which would be much more computationally intensive, and does not exactly how spread reacts to different corner radii. I think, if we want to define spread for text-shadow in terms of stroking, that Backgrounds and Borders should do the same thing. Simon
Received on Monday, 30 January 2012 20:10:42 UTC