- From: Joergen W. Lang <joergen_lang@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:39:35 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>, jwl@worldmusic.de, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, www-style@w3.org
Am 25.01.12 17:17, schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Lea Verou<leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: >> FWIW I think there shouldn't be a list at all. It's a maintenance nightmare >> to have to update the spec every time a new property is defined. As long as >> it defines how each value type is interpolated, their combination and >> potential exceptions, I never got why an all inclusive list is needed. A >> list of a few examples, sure, but a list that has to include every CSS >> property?! > > In general, the list includes everything that was "mature" at the time > Transitions was created. We now have an "Animatable" line in the > propdef tables in our spec template, so all CSS3 specs should include > their animation information as part of their property descriptions, > and the list in Transitions can just deal with 2.1 properties. Does this mean all propdef tables for CSS3+ will eentually be updated to carry this information? That would indeed be good news. Jø
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 23:40:09 UTC