Am 25.01.12 17:17, schrieb Tab Atkins Jr.: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:19 AM, Lea Verou<leaverou@gmail.com> wrote: >> FWIW I think there shouldn't be a list at all. It's a maintenance nightmare >> to have to update the spec every time a new property is defined. As long as >> it defines how each value type is interpolated, their combination and >> potential exceptions, I never got why an all inclusive list is needed. A >> list of a few examples, sure, but a list that has to include every CSS >> property?! > > In general, the list includes everything that was "mature" at the time > Transitions was created. We now have an "Animatable" line in the > propdef tables in our spec template, so all CSS3 specs should include > their animation information as part of their property descriptions, > and the list in Transitions can just deal with 2.1 properties. Does this mean all propdef tables for CSS3+ will eentually be updated to carry this information? That would indeed be good news. JøReceived on Friday, 27 January 2012 23:40:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:10 UTC