- From: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:36:58 +0000
- To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Witold Baryluk <baryluk@smp.if.uj.edu.pl>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Hardy [mailto:vhardy@adobe.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 7:09 PM > > I will let Rossen comment further because he is the author of the document: > > http://wiki.csswg.org/_media/spec/css3-regions/auto-sizing.pdf Thanks Vincent, this threat slipped inside my junk folder... >> On 12-26 19:44, fantasai wrote: >> >> It should definitely be possible for the last region to have auto >>height. I assume an auto-height region would just consume all the >>content in the flow. In the typical case computing 'height: auto' on regions (especially the last one) should doable. There are complications when there are writing modes with orthogonal direction, but again that should be solvable. >> Wrt auto widths, intrinsic sizing for regions would be similar to the >> intrinsic sizing of shrinkwrapped elements across pages: that is, the >> min-content and max-content sizes are calculated across the entire flow, >> and the width is then calculated per fragment using those content sizes. I agree that this is pretty straight forward to implement and spec (see Option 1 in my doc). There are of course degenerate cases of wide content in previous or subsequent regions that would make less than optimal layout. I am also fine with reopening this issue for regions and defining it this way - it will be much better than not having shrink-to-fit at all for sure. Cheers, Rossen
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 06:37:33 UTC