On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Brice PARENT <brice@websailors.fr> wrote: > OK. But this makes it really hard to read! > It would be easier to have something like ":any(ancestor1 > ancestor2,ancestor2 ancestor1) elem{}" or ":and(ancestor1, ancestor2) > elem{}" > Both solutions would avoid having on the same line 2 different ways of > writting equivalent contents, allowing anyone to understand it quickly! The first one works (though there's still duplication). The second is probably not worth optimizing for. ~TJReceived on Friday, 27 January 2012 00:27:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:10 UTC