- From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:34:32 +0200
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On 26/1/12 02:08, Brian Kardell wrote: > Yes, I recall that ... and several people read ! as "not" which is where > ? came from I think. Its bike shedding to an extent, I admit, but I > don't think without value to discard problematic ideas early on in favor > of less problematic ones.... > ! as "not" is a prefix operator, not a postfix one, as the one currently defined in the selectors4 draft. So, FWIW I don't think there's going to be any such confusion. I actually thought it's a great idea that it was changed to a ! since that's what we use in natural language too in order to highlight something important. -- Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:35:12 UTC