- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:25:49 -0800
- To: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 01/25/2012 11:31 AM, Vincent Hardy wrote: > fantasai wrote: >> >> # When a break splits a box, the box's margins, borders, and padding have no visual >> # effect where the split occurs. However, the margin immediately after a forced >> # page/column/region break will be preserved. A forced page/column/region break is >> # a break that does not occur naturally. >> >> This paragraph is inaccurate and should be replaced by a paragraph stating simply that >> breaking across regions is treated exactly the same as breaking across pages. >> > > [vh] I am happy to remove that if that is the right thing to do. It would help to understand why the paragraph is incorrect. The text is modeled after: > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg//css3-multicol/Overview.html#column-breaks > > which says: > > "When a page or column break splits a box, the box's margins, borders, and padding have no visual effect where the split occurs. However, the margin immediately after a forced page/column break will be preserved. A forced page/column break is a break that does not occur naturally." > > Is the text in regions saying something inaccurate compared to the multi-column spec? If so, can you point out what the issue specific to regions? Or is the issue in both regions and multi-column? Both specs are wrong, given the existence of 'box-decoration-break'. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 21:26:26 UTC