Re: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> David:
>> I think calc() should not have any discontinuities, i.e., putting
>> "calc()" around a valid value shouldn't change its behavior, and
>> putting a "+1px" inside a calc() should move change the result by
>> 1px.
>
> As it currently stands, calc() does not have discontinuities regarding this.
>
> More specifically...
>
> Example A:
>        width: 200px;
>        background-position: calc(10%);
> Example B:
>        width: 200px;
>        background-position: calc(10% + 1px);
>
> The left edge of the image for Example A is at offset 20px.  For Example B, it's 21px.  No discontinuity.

You're ignoring the first discontinuity that David talks about, which
is about wrapping a percentage in a calc().

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 19:28:35 UTC