- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:13:27 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai@inkedblade.net>
On Tuesday 2012-01-24 19:06 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > Joking aside, am I reading correctly that in some cases the <position> value type > resolves differently than in others? I'll assume that's both unfortunate and > unavoidable and, hopefully, not too surprising in most cases. A list of those > properties categorized by how they resolve it would be interesting. Seems like > fodder for a blog post, at least. In some cases it's positioning one rectangle within another; in other cases it's positioning a point within a rectangle. If you treat the second case (point in rectangle) as a special case of the first (rectangle in rectangle) where the inner object always has 0 width and 0 height, then they're not different; it's just that the second case is more limited. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 19:14:04 UTC